1. The
surprise part. Actually, before we start, we had the frame of the story, so I
thought we could just create our narrative according to the frame at first. But
when we really began our Twitter narrative, I understood that plans can't keep
up with changes. First, we did not make it clear why we should use the hashtag
# ContainMyself in our frame, so when we used it in our narrative, it was quite
wired so that it surprised me a lot. At the beginning, we thought it was a way
to show the love for the company. In addition, we thought by using this hashtag
and including the word “contain”, our twitter robot can easily “favorite” and “retweet”
our tweets because “Contain” is the key term for our twitter robot to search
for. But the fact was that the two of the characters argued with each other, so
they did not use this hashtag in every tweet (if they did, the audience would
be confused). In order to deal with it, we decided to include the hashtag only
when it was necessary. But the new problem came, how could Jen calculate our
numbers of tweets at last since we just reply to each other? Then we decided
that our twitter robot would “retweet” every tweet that mentioned the company.
These are two surprises from our narrative and we adapted it well at last.
2. The
part I am most proud is the development of the love story. The lovers begin
with argument and then they know each other better by sharing interests and
experiences, though at this time, the girl just wants to get some confidnetial
information about the company. She is actually moved by the sincere of the man
gradually. And then they talk about the beautiful story of Liang Shanbo &
Zhu Yingtai. This is the metaphor for their future, but their future is worse
than this story, under the background of the conflicts between two rival
companies.
3. I
think infographics were the most useful media because they helped the two main
characters to develop their love relationship by showing each other the places
they went, things they liked and so on, very vivid and attractive so that they
can know each other better.
4. I
enjoy the vlog part most because it was quite interesting and entertaining. We
spent lots of time in our vlog. The video was more useful than photos since it
made the conflicts more vivid and developed the narrative fully. Our vlog was
about an employee’s complaint towards the company. During the disappearance of
one main character, the appearance of this vlog added fun to this story and
weakened the sadness of the story. It made the audience laugh more or less.
5. I
think the least useful media is the blogs. We added them just to reinforce the information
we gave, but actually they did not function well or help much with our twitter
narrative. Actually I think we did not have a clear purpose why we used it. We
just use it because we needed to.
6. I
enjoyed the text least because I think it was weak when I wanted to show my
strong feelings such as love and anger. Text could not fully show my love
towards the other one. “I love U” is quite weak. If I created a video or
infographic to show my love, it may show my sincere greatly.
7. I
think the point I would change and do differently is the argument and quarrel
between two people. I think since we are Chinese, the language of quarrel tends
to be Chinglish, which may expose our Chinese identities. So next time, I
should study the language Americans use in their daily life so that we can “be”
Americans in that way. And next time, we may change the ending of the story.
Since in this narrative, he performed so weakly because of love towards the
female character. Maybe next time, they do not love each other at all, just
want to take advantage of each other. This may make the story more interesting.
8. The
other thing I want you to know is that during the quarrel, we used the
different logical fallacies to rebut each other. I think this part was quite
useful and improved the quality of our quarrels. For example, one of our
quarrels is that Noah Cook thinks Johnon must bully his niece because his niece
cries besides Johnon and Johnon cannot prove that he did not bully her. This is
the Argument from Ignorance. A claim is true because it has not been or cannot
be proven false. And then Johnon attacks Noah Cook personally, which shows that
he makes the fallacy of Ad hominem. I think this part is interesting and
improves the quality of the quarrel, which usually is about meaningless dirty
words.
